Financial Highlights
- Net Sales: ¥7.08B
- Operating Income: ¥1.22B
- Net Income: ¥815M
- EPS: ¥38.43
Income Statement
| Item | Current | Prior | YoY % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Sales | ¥7.08B | - | - |
| Cost of Sales | ¥4.26B | - | - |
| Gross Profit | ¥2.81B | - | - |
| SG&A Expenses | ¥1.60B | - | - |
| Operating Income | ¥1.22B | - | - |
| Non-operating Income | ¥18M | - | - |
| Non-operating Expenses | ¥13M | - | - |
| Ordinary Income | ¥1.22B | - | - |
| Profit Before Tax | ¥1.21B | - | - |
| Income Tax Expense | ¥395M | - | - |
| Net Income | ¥815M | - | - |
| Net Income Attributable to Owners | ¥815M | - | - |
| Total Comprehensive Income | ¥792M | - | - |
| Depreciation & Amortization | ¥15M | - | - |
| Interest Expense | ¥13M | - | - |
| Basic EPS | ¥38.43 | - | - |
Balance Sheet
| Item | Current End | Prior End | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Assets | ¥6.51B | ¥6.65B | −¥140M |
| Cash and Deposits | ¥4.33B | ¥4.73B | −¥402M |
| Accounts Receivable | ¥2.06B | ¥1.79B | +¥274M |
| Non-current Assets | ¥2.25B | ¥2.40B | −¥155M |
| Property, Plant & Equipment | ¥102M | ¥94M | +¥8M |
| Intangible Assets | ¥1.57B | ¥1.64B | −¥77M |
| Goodwill | ¥1.44B | ¥1.52B | −¥76M |
| Total Assets | ¥8.76B | ¥9.06B | −¥296M |
| Current Liabilities | ¥1.67B | ¥1.87B | −¥205M |
| Non-current Liabilities | ¥1.57B | ¥1.96B | −¥387M |
| Long-term Loans | ¥874M | ¥928M | −¥54M |
| Total Liabilities | ¥3.24B | ¥3.84B | −¥591M |
| Total Equity | ¥5.52B | ¥5.22B | +¥296M |
| Capital Stock | ¥238M | ¥238M | ¥0 |
| Capital Surplus | ¥168M | ¥168M | ¥0 |
| Retained Earnings | ¥5.04B | ¥4.67B | +¥369M |
| Treasury Stock | −¥51M | −¥1M | −¥50M |
| Owners' Equity | ¥5.52B | ¥5.22B | +¥296M |
| Working Capital | ¥4.85B | - | - |
Cash Flow Statement
| Item | Current | Prior | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | ¥149M | - | - |
| Investing Cash Flow | −¥3M | - | - |
| Financing Cash Flow | −¥549M | - | - |
| Free Cash Flow | ¥146M | - | - |
Profitability Ratios
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Net Profit Margin | 11.5% |
| Gross Profit Margin | 39.8% |
| Current Ratio | 390.3% |
| Quick Ratio | 390.3% |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio | 0.59x |
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 96.86x |
| EBITDA Margin | 17.4% |
| Effective Tax Rate | 32.6% |
Share Information
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding (incl. Treasury) | 21.26M shares |
| Treasury Stock | 57K shares |
| Average Shares Outstanding | 21.21M shares |
| Book Value Per Share | ¥260.34 |
| EBITDA | ¥1.23B |
Dividend Information
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Q2 Dividend | ¥43.00 |
Full Year Forecast
| Item | Forecast |
|---|---|
| Net Sales Forecast | ¥14.02B |
| Operating Income Forecast | ¥2.02B |
| Ordinary Income Forecast | ¥2.00B |
| Net Income Attributable to Owners Forecast | ¥1.25B |
| Basic EPS Forecast | ¥58.85 |
AI Financial Analysis
Executive Summary
Altner delivered strong first-half FY2027 profitability, with earnings tracking ahead of the company’s full-year plan, but cash conversion was materially weak. Revenue was ¥7.08bn and operating income was ¥1.22bn. Net income attributable to owners was ¥0.82bn, equivalent to EPS of ¥38.43. The operating margin was 17.2%, exceeding the 15% threshold generally associated with excellent profitability. The gross margin was also robust at 39.8%, indicating substantial value added relative to the cost base. The net profit margin was 11.5%, also in the excellent range. EBITDA was ¥1.23bn, or a 17.4% EBITDA margin. On an annualized basis, reported ROE was 29.5%, underpinned by a 11.5% net margin, 1.615x asset turnover, and 1.59x financial leverage. Revenue progress reached 50.5% of the full-year forecast at the first-half stage. Operating-income progress was stronger at 60.3%, while ordinary-income progress was 61.1%. Net-income progress was 65.3%, more than 15 percentage points ahead of the standard 50% first-half run rate. This outperformance suggests that the forecast assumes a more moderate second-half earnings contribution, although execution against the full-year plan remains necessary. Earnings quality is the principal concern, as operating cash flow was only ¥0.15bn against net income of ¥0.82bn. The resulting OCF-to-net-income ratio of 0.18x and OCF-to-EBITDA cash conversion of 0.12x indicate that reported accounting earnings were not yet translating into cash. Liquidity and debt-service capacity remain very strong, supported by ¥4.33bn of cash, a 390.3% current ratio, and 98.1x EBITDA interest coverage. The interim dividend of ¥43.00 per share exceeds first-half EPS and implies a 112.1% payout ratio based on first-half earnings, making future cash-flow normalization important for dividend sustainability. JGAAP goodwill amortization of ¥0.76bn is a meaningful but manageable drag on reported operating profit, with EBITDA before goodwill amortization of ¥1.31bn.
Profitability Analysis
The annualized 3-factor DuPont ROE of 29.5% decomposes into a 11.5% net profit margin, 1.615x asset turnover, and 1.59x financial leverage. The strongest contributor is the net margin, which is above the 10% excellent-profitability benchmark and reflects a 39.8% gross margin combined with a 17.2% EBIT margin. Asset turnover of 1.615x is also supportive for a human-capital and engineering-services-oriented operating model with limited tangible fixed assets. Financial leverage is moderate rather than aggressive, so the high annualized ROE is principally driven by operating profitability and asset utilization rather than balance-sheet leverage. EBITDA of ¥1.23bn exceeded reported operating income by only ¥0.15bn before considering goodwill amortization, consistent with a relatively asset-light tangible capital base. Under JGAAP, goodwill amortization was ¥0.76bn, lifting EBITDA before goodwill amortization to ¥1.31bn and the corresponding pre-goodwill-amortization EBITDA margin to approximately 18.5%. Goodwill amortization represented approximately 6.2% of EBITDA, a moderate JGAAP accounting burden that should be considered when comparing profitability with IFRS peers that do not amortize goodwill. The five-factor DuPont components indicate a 0.994 interest burden, showing that interest costs have very limited impact on pre-tax earnings. The 0.674 tax burden reflects an effective tax rate of 32.6%, which is somewhat above a normalized 30% level but remains consistent with a conventional Japanese corporate tax profile. Ordinary income of ¥1.22bn was broadly in line with operating income of ¥1.22bn, demonstrating that profit generation was primarily operational rather than dependent on non-operating income. The ¥0.12bn extraordinary loss on the sale of investment securities reduced profit before tax, but its scale was only around 1.0% of revenue and does not materially alter the operating earnings assessment.
Growth Assessment
First-half revenue of ¥7.08bn represents 50.5% progress toward the ¥14.02bn full-year revenue forecast, broadly consistent with a normal first-half run rate. The full-year plan calls for 16.4% revenue growth, indicating management expects continued expansion through the second half. Operating income of ¥1.22bn already represents 60.3% of the ¥2.02bn full-year target, 10.3 percentage points above the standard 50% first-half progress rate. Ordinary-income progress of 61.1% is similarly ahead of the standard run rate. Net income of ¥0.82bn has reached 65.3% of the ¥1.25bn annual target, 15.3 percentage points above the standard first-half benchmark. The stronger first-half profit progression relative to revenue suggests favorable operating leverage, pricing, utilization, mix, or timing of expenses during the period. The full-year forecast nevertheless anticipates operating-income growth of 10.7%, below planned revenue growth of 16.4%, implying some second-half margin normalization or incremental investment. Forecast net income is planned to decline 0.9% despite revenue growth, highlighting the importance of tax, non-operating items, and cost progression in the second half. The single-reporting-segment structure indicates that group-level profitability and customer demand concentration should be assessed at the consolidated level. Capital expenditure of ¥0.16bn was marginally above depreciation and amortization of ¥0.15bn, with a 1.05x CapEx-to-depreciation ratio indicating that the company is at least maintaining its asset base. Intangible-asset purchases of ¥0.46bn were larger than tangible capital expenditure, consistent with the importance of acquired intangible assets and software-related investment in the group’s capital base.
Financial Health
Financial health is strong from a liquidity and conventional leverage perspective. Current assets of ¥6.51bn exceeded current liabilities of ¥1.67bn by ¥4.84bn, producing a 390.3% current ratio. The quick ratio was also 390.3%, as current assets are predominantly cash and receivables rather than inventory. Cash and deposits of ¥4.33bn accounted for 49.4% of total assets and covered total interest-bearing debt multiple times. Debt-to-equity was 0.59x, well below the 2.0x level associated with aggressive leverage. Debt-to-capital was 13.7%, and debt-to-EBITDA was only 0.71x, both consistent with conservative debt capacity. EBITDA interest coverage of 98.08x and EBIT interest coverage of 96.86x indicate minimal interest-servicing risk. Current liabilities were ¥1.67bn, while available current assets were ¥6.51bn, so there is no apparent short-term maturity mismatch. Noncurrent liabilities of ¥1.57bn include ¥0.87bn of long-term loans, a ¥0.52bn net defined-benefit liability, and a ¥0.18bn provision for directors’ retirement benefits. Goodwill represented 26.1% of equity and 16.5% of total assets, remaining within the stated healthy benchmark of below 30% of equity. Intangible assets represented 17.9% of total assets, also below the 20% balanced-asset benchmark. Treasury stock increased to negative ¥0.51bn from negative ¥0.01bn, reflecting ¥0.50bn of share repurchases; this is a deliberate capital-allocation use rather than an operating-liquidity issue, although it reduces equity available to absorb shocks. The provision for directors’ retirement benefits declined by ¥0.36bn, or 66.1%, and was a meaningful contributor to lower noncurrent liabilities.
Notable B/S Changes
Treasury stock: increased in absolute negative balance by ¥0.50bn, from negative ¥0.01bn to negative ¥0.51bn (-4,813.0%) - reflects ¥0.50bn of share repurchases, reducing equity while remaining readily manageable given the cash balance and low leverage. Provision for directors' retirement benefits: decreased by ¥0.36bn (-66.1%), from ¥0.55bn to ¥0.18bn - reduced noncurrent liabilities and improved reported capital structure, while the underlying settlement or reassessment should be monitored. Work in process: increased by ¥0.08bn (+99.1%), from ¥0.08bn to ¥0.15bn - small in absolute value but consistent with the high 74.8% work-in-process ratio within inventory and relevant to project billing and cash-conversion monitoring.
Cash Flow Quality
Cash-flow quality was weak in the first half despite strong reported profitability. Operating cash flow was ¥0.15bn, compared with net income of ¥0.82bn, resulting in an OCF-to-net-income ratio of 0.18x versus the 0.8x warning threshold. Cash conversion, measured as OCF divided by EBITDA, was only 0.12x, materially below the 0.7x concern threshold. The key root cause was working-capital absorption: trade receivables increased by ¥2.74bn and other payables decreased by ¥2.20bn in the operating-cash-flow bridge. Income taxes paid of ¥0.29bn also reduced operating cash generation. Free cash flow was positive at ¥0.15bn after ¥0.16bn of capital expenditure, but it was far below both net income and shareholder distributions. The 7.6% accruals ratio is not at the above-10% high-concern threshold, but it is elevated relative to the below-5% high-quality benchmark and is consistent with the weak cash realization of earnings. Work in process was ¥0.15bn, equivalent to 74.8% of inventory and above the 40% quality-alert threshold. In an engineering and project-delivery context, a high work-in-process ratio can reflect project timing and work performed ahead of billing; however, it also raises the importance of monitoring project completion, billing conversion, and potential cost overruns. The high work-in-process ratio is less material in absolute yen terms than receivable and payable movements, but it reinforces the need to evaluate working-capital discipline. Investing cash outflow was limited at ¥0.03bn, while intangible asset purchases of ¥0.46bn indicate a greater commitment to intangible investment than is captured by the narrow capital-expenditure figure. Financing cash outflow was ¥5.49bn, primarily driven by ¥4.44bn of cash dividends and ¥0.50bn of share repurchases, alongside long-term debt repayment. Cash declined by ¥4.02bn during the period, but the ending cash balance of ¥4.32bn remains substantial.
Dividend Sustainability
The declared interim dividend was ¥43.00 per share. Against first-half EPS of ¥38.43, the stated first-half payout ratio is 112.1%, exceeding the 100% warning threshold. The company also repurchased ¥0.50bn of shares during the period. Cash dividends paid were ¥4.44bn and share repurchases were ¥0.50bn, implying total shareholder distributions of approximately ¥4.95bn during the first half. Relative to first-half net income of ¥0.82bn, the total return ratio was approximately 60.7%, although this comparison is affected by the timing of cash dividend payments. Relative to first-half free cash flow of ¥0.15bn, dividend coverage was only 0.16x, and coverage would be lower after including repurchases. The immediate balance-sheet capacity to fund distributions is strong because cash and deposits were ¥4.33bn and net leverage was low. However, sustainable distributions should ultimately be supported by normalized operating cash flow rather than cash balances or timing-related movements. The announced share split means that per-share dividend figures should be interpreted with appropriate adjustment for comparability across periods. Continuation of the distribution profile depends principally on recovery in receivable collection, normalization of working-capital cash flow, and delivery of the full-year earnings plan.
Risk Assessment
Business risks include Working-capital execution risk is elevated: a ¥2.74bn increase in trade receivables and a ¥2.20bn decrease in other payables contributed to weak operating cash conversion despite a 17.2% operating margin., The 74.8% work-in-process share of inventory is a quality alert. For project-based engineering services, delayed milestone acceptance, billing delays, or project cost overruns could delay cash collection and pressure margins., The full-year forecast embeds 16.4% revenue growth but only 10.7% operating-income growth, creating risk of second-half margin compression from hiring, wage inflation, utilization changes, or business-mix shifts., Goodwill of ¥1.44bn and intangible assets of ¥1.57bn make acquisition integration and acquired-asset value retention relevant risks, although current goodwill metrics remain within healthy ranges., Industry-specific talent risk is significant for an engineering-services company: shortages of qualified engineers, elevated recruitment costs, and employee retention pressure can constrain revenue growth and utilization..
Financial risks include OCF-to-net-income of 0.18x is materially below the 0.8x warning threshold, signaling that first-half accounting earnings were not converted into cash., Cash conversion of 0.12x of EBITDA is well below the 0.7x alert threshold and makes cash-flow normalization a key financial monitoring item., The ¥43.00 interim dividend represents a 112.1% payout ratio relative to first-half EPS, while free-cash-flow coverage was only 0.16x., JGAAP goodwill amortization of ¥0.76bn is approximately 6.2% of EBITDA; while manageable, it reduces reported operating and net earnings relative to an IFRS presentation., There is no material liquidity, refinancing, or interest-rate-servicing stress indicated by the 390.3% current ratio, 0.71x debt-to-EBITDA, and 98.08x EBITDA interest coverage..
Key concerns include Highest priority: conversion of receivables and project work in progress into operating cash flow during the second half., High priority: whether operating-income progress of 60.3% can be maintained while management executes its full-year revenue-growth plan., Moderate priority: whether dividends and buybacks remain aligned with recurring free-cash-flow generation rather than being funded from cash reserves., Moderate priority: preservation of acquired goodwill and intangible-asset value, given their combined significance within noncurrent assets..
Investment Implications
Key takeaways include Profitability is strong, with a 17.2% operating margin, 11.5% net margin, and 29.5% annualized ROE., First-half progress is ahead of the full-year plan for operating income, ordinary income, and net income., The earnings thesis is tempered by weak cash realization: OCF was ¥0.15bn versus ¥0.82bn of net income., The balance sheet is liquid and conservatively leveraged, providing capacity to absorb temporary cash-flow volatility., The interim dividend and share repurchase program require improved free-cash-flow generation to be supported by recurring cash earnings..
Metrics to watch include Operating cash flow and OCF-to-net-income ratio, with particular focus on movement toward or above 0.8x., Trade receivables, project billing, collections, and the work-in-process share of inventory., Second-half operating margin versus the 17.2% first-half level and versus the full-year operating-income target., Full-year forecast achievement: revenue progress of 50.5%, operating-income progress of 60.3%, and net-income progress of 65.3% at Q2., Free-cash-flow coverage of dividends and total shareholder distributions., Goodwill, goodwill amortization, and any indicators of impairment risk..
Regarding relative positioning, Altner’s reported profitability and annualized ROE are strong for an asset-light engineering-services model, while leverage and liquidity are substantially more conservative than levels that would normally raise credit concerns. Its principal relative weakness is cash conversion rather than margin generation: the 0.18x OCF-to-net-income ratio and 0.12x OCF-to-EBITDA ratio contrast sharply with otherwise high-quality profitability metrics.