About Quarterly Earnings Report Disclosures
| Item | Current | Prior | YoY % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Sales | ¥44.60B | ¥38.85B | +14.8% |
| Ordinary Income | ¥6.64B | ¥5.34B | +24.2% |
| Profit Before Tax | ¥6.56B | ¥5.36B | +22.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | ¥2.14B | ¥1.64B | +30.2% |
| Net Income | ¥4.03B | ¥3.17B | +27.4% |
| Net Income Attributable to Owners | ¥4.43B | ¥3.71B | +19.3% |
| Total Comprehensive Income | ¥18.64B | ¥-2.57B | +825.0% |
| Basic EPS | ¥291.11 | ¥236.97 | +22.8% |
| Diluted EPS | ¥289.09 | ¥235.33 | +22.8% |
| Dividend Per Share | ¥50.00 | ¥50.00 | +0.0% |
| Item | Current End | Prior End | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Property, Plant & Equipment | ¥29.52B | ¥29.37B | +¥149M |
| Intangible Assets | ¥1.07B | ¥842M | +¥229M |
| Total Assets | ¥4.48T | ¥4.51T | ¥-25.61B |
| Total Liabilities | ¥4.26T | ¥4.30T | ¥-42.53B |
| Total Equity | ¥225.48B | ¥208.56B | +¥16.93B |
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Net Profit Margin | 9.9% |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio | 18.87x |
| Effective Tax Rate | 32.6% |
| Item | YoY Change |
|---|---|
| Net Sales YoY Change | +14.8% |
| Ordinary Income YoY Change | +24.2% |
| Net Income YoY Change | +27.4% |
| Net Income Attributable to Owners YoY Change | +19.3% |
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding (incl. Treasury) | 15.69M shares |
| Treasury Stock | 607K shares |
| Average Shares Outstanding | 15.22M shares |
| Book Value Per Share | ¥14,945.85 |
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Q2 Dividend | ¥50.00 |
| Year-End Dividend | ¥60.00 |
| Item | Forecast |
|---|---|
| Net Sales Forecast | ¥87.20B |
| Ordinary Income Forecast | ¥13.70B |
| Net Income Forecast | ¥8.40B |
| Net Income Attributable to Owners Forecast | ¥9.20B |
| Basic EPS Forecast | ¥604.38 |
| Dividend Per Share Forecast | ¥85.00 |
This data was automatically extracted from XBRL files. Please refer to the original disclosure documents for accuracy.
Verdict: Solid top-line and profit growth in H1 FY2026 with slight margin expansion, but structurally low returns persist given a 2.0% ROE and a 1.0% NIM. Revenue rose to 446.01 (+14.8% YoY), ordinary income reached 66.40 (+24.2% YoY), and net income was 44.31 (+19.3% YoY). Net margin improved to 9.9%, from an estimated 9.5% a year ago, implying roughly +38 bps of expansion. EPS (basic) printed at 291.11 yen, with diluted at 289.09 yen, indicating limited dilution. The effective tax rate was 32.6%, broadly in line with domestic norms. Balance sheet scale remains large (total assets 44,810.88) versus equity of 2,254.84, reflecting typical bank leverage. The DuPont breakdown yields net margin 9.9%, asset turnover 0.010x, and financial leverage 19.87x, combining to ROE of 2.0%—confirming capital efficiency remains subdued. Banking KPIs are mixed: a very efficient Cost-to-Income Ratio (CIR) at 32.0% contrasts with a weak Net Interest Margin (NIM) at 1.0%. The Loan-to-Deposit Ratio (LDR) at 68.7% signals conservative funding/liquidity but also underutilized balance sheet, potentially capping earnings. Ordinary income growth outpaced revenue growth, suggesting positive operating leverage and/or a better revenue mix, though detailed drivers (fees, credit costs, securities) were not disclosed. Earnings quality cannot be validated as operating cash flow data are unreported. The reported payout ratio of 39.0% looks manageable against current earnings, but capital adequacy metrics (e.g., CET1) are not provided, limiting dividend sustainability assessment. Comprehensive income was a high 186.41, likely reflecting valuation gains captured in OCI, which can be volatile with rate moves. Forward-looking, profitability sensitivity to interest rates and securities valuations remains the key swing factor, while low LDR provides room to deploy liquidity if credit demand improves. Overall, results demonstrate disciplined cost control and profit growth, but structural headwinds in NIM keep ROE well below cost of equity, making sustained improvement contingent on mix shift, loan growth, and rate environment.
ROE decomposition: ROE (2.0%) = Net Profit Margin (9.9%) × Asset Turnover (0.010x) × Financial Leverage (19.87x). The biggest contributor to the YoY change appears to be margin: net margin increased from 9.55% to 9.9% (+38 bps), while asset turnover (~0.010x given revenue 446.01 and assets 44,810.88) likely changed little; leverage (assets/equity ~19.87x) appears stable for a regional bank. Business drivers behind margin improvement likely include operating leverage (ordinary income +24.2% vs revenue +14.8%) supported by a very low CIR (32.0%), and possibly benign credit costs/securities results, though details are undisclosed. The sustainability of margin gains is moderate: cost discipline can persist, but NIM at 1.0% is structurally weak, and gains from market-related income (if any) may be non-recurring. Operating leverage risk: with such a low LDR (68.7%), incremental revenue growth may require either loan growth (credit risk) or greater reliance on securities/fees (market/fee risk). Concerning trend flags: while not directly visible, the combination of low NIM and conservative LDR suggests limited core spread earnings; continued reliance on non-spread income would raise earnings volatility if it increases.
Revenue growth of +14.8% YoY and ordinary income growth of +24.2% YoY reflect positive operating leverage in H1. Net income rose +19.3% YoY to 44.31, with net margin improving to 9.9% from ~9.6% a year ago. The uptick likely stems from strong cost control (CIR 32.0%), and potentially stable credit costs and/or securities-related gains (undisclosed). Sustainability hinges on loan growth and pricing power; with NIM at 1.0% and LDR 68.7%, core spread expansion looks constrained absent rate or mix tailwinds. Fee income and market-related income can supplement growth but carry higher volatility. The wide positive comprehensive income (186.41) indicates meaningful valuation gains flowing through OCI, which are rate-sensitive and non-cash; this inflates total return optics but may reverse with yield changes. Without segment or product detail, the quality of growth skews toward cost-driven efficiency rather than core spread expansion. Outlook: base-case steady but modest earnings trajectory, with upside if loan demand recovers or if asset re-pricing lifts NIM, and downside if rates move adversely or credit costs normalize upward.
Leverage is high in appearance (D/E 18.87x) but is structurally normal for banks; equity is 2,254.84 against assets of 44,810.88. Liquidity positioning is conservative: LDR at 68.7% implies ample deposit funding versus loans, lowering liquidity risk but capping yield. CIR at 32.0% underscores strong cost efficiency, supporting resilience under margin pressure. Current ratio and quick ratio are not meaningful for banks and are unreported; no warning triggered. There is no explicit data on short-term borrowings or wholesale funding reliance; deposits total 34,319.81. Maturity mismatch risk cannot be fully assessed without asset-liability tenor detail, but low LDR generally mitigates near-term funding stress. Off-balance sheet obligations (guarantees, commitments, derivatives) are not disclosed here; lack of disclosure is a limitation.
Operating cash flow and free cash flow are unreported, so OCF/Net Income and FCF coverage cannot be assessed. Earnings quality signals from accruals/working capital cannot be evaluated due to missing data. The large positive comprehensive income versus net income suggests meaningful unrealized gains (likely AFS securities) in OCI, which can reverse; while not an earnings quality issue per se, it highlights valuation sensitivity. With CIR of 32.0%, profit conversion from revenue appears efficient, but cash validation is unavailable. No signs of working capital manipulation can be inferred given banking business model and lack of disclosure.
The calculated payout ratio is 39.0%, comfortably below the 60% guideline and appears sustainable against current earnings capacity. Dividend per share data are unreported, and cash flow data are unavailable, so FCF coverage cannot be verified. Capital adequacy (e.g., CET1, total capital ratio) is not provided; hence, we cannot confirm buffer strength for distributions under stress. Given ROE at 2.0% and low NIM, excess capital accretion may be modest; however, conservative balance sheet (LDR 68.7%) supports stability. Policy outlook likely favors stable/dividend-maintenance bias typical of regional banks, contingent on capital ratios and earnings durability.
Business Risks:
Financial Risks:
Key Concerns:
Key Takeaways:
Metrics to Watch:
Relative Positioning: Within Japanese regional banks, Oita Bank exhibits excellent cost efficiency (CIR ~32%) and conservative funding (LDR ~69%), but faces structurally weak NIM and low ROE, placing it as a defensively run franchise with below-peer profitability potential unless rate/loan growth tailwinds emerge.
This analysis was auto-generated by AI. Please note the following:
| Capital Stock | ¥19.60B | ¥19.60B | ¥0 |
| Capital Surplus | ¥13.77B | ¥13.77B | ¥0 |
| Retained Earnings | ¥164.32B | ¥160.84B | +¥3.49B |
| Treasury Stock | ¥-2.46B | ¥-1.62B | ¥-833M |
| Owners' Equity | ¥225.09B | ¥208.22B | +¥16.87B |