The Chikuho Bank, Ltd. FY2026 Q2 earnings report and financial analysis
About Quarterly Earnings Report Disclosures
| Item | Current | Prior | YoY % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary Income | ¥596M | ¥462M | +29.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | ¥41M | - | - |
| Net Income | ¥504M | ¥477M | +5.7% |
| Net Income Attributable to Owners | ¥425M | ¥342M | +24.3% |
| Total Comprehensive Income | ¥4.24B | ¥-2.04B | +307.5% |
| Basic EPS | ¥70.33 | ¥56.34 | +24.8% |
| Dividend Per Share | ¥25.00 | ¥25.00 | +0.0% |
| Item | Current End | Prior End | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Property, Plant & Equipment | ¥9.03B | - | - |
| Intangible Assets | ¥573M | - | - |
| Total Assets | ¥914.67B | ¥883.10B | +¥31.57B |
| Total Liabilities | ¥850.66B | - | - |
| Total Equity | ¥36.19B | ¥32.44B | +¥3.75B |
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio | 23.51x |
| Item | YoY Change |
|---|---|
| Ordinary Income YoY Change | +28.9% |
| Net Income YoY Change | +5.6% |
| Net Income Attributable to Owners YoY Change | +24.0% |
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding (incl. Treasury) | 6.25M shares |
| Treasury Stock | 406K shares |
| Average Shares Outstanding | 6.04M shares |
| Book Value Per Share | ¥6,193.01 |
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Q2 Dividend | ¥25.00 |
| Year-End Dividend | ¥25.00 |
| Item | Forecast |
|---|---|
| Ordinary Income Forecast | ¥1.48B |
| Net Income Forecast | ¥1.03B |
| Net Income Attributable to Owners Forecast | ¥1.10B |
| Basic EPS Forecast | ¥185.08 |
| Dividend Per Share Forecast | ¥25.00 |
This data was automatically extracted from XBRL files. Please refer to the original disclosure documents for accuracy.
Chikugo Bank (Consolidated, JGAAP) reported FY2026 Q2 ordinary income of ¥596 million and net income of ¥425 million, with net income up 24% YoY based on the provided tag, while ordinary income appears flat YoY. Many line items are unreported (shown as zero per the data note), which is common for banks where XBRL tagging differs from manufacturing formats. Total assets stand at ¥914.674 billion and total equity at ¥36.185 billion, implying an assets-to-equity multiple of approximately 25.3x and an equity ratio of roughly 4.0% (calculated), consistent with regional bank leverage. The implied effective tax rate is about 8.8% (¥41 million tax on ¥466 million pre-tax income), suggesting the presence of tax-effect items or income components with preferential tax treatment. The difference between ordinary income (¥596 million) and implied pre-tax income (¥466 million) indicates unreported non-operating/extraordinary items, minority interests, or valuation movements not visible in the dataset. On an annualized basis, net income would be approximately ¥0.85–0.90 billion if H1 run-rate continues, implying an annualized ROE near 2–3% versus roughly 1.2% non-annualized for the half-year, which is subdued but within a conservative regional-bank profile under a low-rate environment. Reported DuPont sub-metrics (net margin, asset turnover) show zeros due to non-disclosure; however, leverage (assets/equity ~25x) aligns with the provided financial leverage figure. Liquidity ratios like current and quick ratios are not meaningful for banks given their balance-sheet structure; capital adequacy (e.g., CET1 ratio) is not disclosed here and is a key missing element. Cash flow statements are unreported, so operating cash flow and free cash flow quality cannot be judged from this dataset. Dividend data are also unreported (DPS and payout ratio shown as zero), so we cannot comment on distributions for this period from the provided numbers. EPS is ¥70.33; back-solving suggests roughly 6.0 million basic shares outstanding, though the share count is not explicitly disclosed. Balance-sheet scale (¥915 billion assets) positions the bank firmly in the regional bank cohort; earnings stability will hinge on net interest margin management, securities portfolio outcomes, and credit costs. Overall, the bank demonstrates modest profitability with leverage typical of its peer set and an improved bottom line YoY, but the lack of granular disclosures limits deeper margin or cash flow diagnostics.
ROE decomposition must be adapted for banks. Using available data: Equity = ¥36.185bn; Assets = ¥914.674bn; Financial leverage ≈ 25.3x (assets/equity), consistent with the provided 25.28. Net profit margin and asset turnover are not meaningful from the provided zero revenue. Instead, we reference ROA/ROE: H1 ROA ≈ 0.046% (¥0.425bn/¥914.674bn); annualized ROA ≈ 0.09–0.10%. H1 ROE ≈ 1.17% (¥0.425bn/¥36.185bn); annualized ROE ≈ 2.3–2.5%, indicating thin profitability. Ordinary income (¥596m) equals reported operating income here, implying the core banking profit driver is the net interest and fees line; however, the gap between ordinary and pre-tax income suggests unreported extraordinary items, valuation losses/gains, or minority interest. Margin quality: the low implied effective tax rate (~8.8%) points to either tax-effect accounting or income composition effects; without net interest income (NII), fee income, or credit cost data, we cannot parse core vs non-core contributions. Operating leverage: Not assessable from this dataset; cost-to-income ratio, personnel costs, and G&A are undisclosed. Efficiency: Asset yield and cost of funds cannot be derived; no NIM provided. Overall, profitability is modest but improved at the net level YoY, likely due to lower credit costs or better securities-related results.
Revenue and gross profit are unreported; ordinary income is flat YoY per the tag, while net income rose 24% YoY, indicating improvement below the ordinary income line (e.g., lower credit costs, extraordinary gains/lower losses, or tax benefits). Given the low-rate domestic environment and recent rate hikes at the margin, growth sustainability will depend on NIM resilience, loan volume growth in the bank’s regional footprint, and securities portfolio outcomes, none of which are disclosed in the dataset. The scale of assets (¥914.7bn) suggests growth is likely incremental; significant acceleration would require either spread expansion or fee diversification. Profit quality is uncertain due to the gap between ordinary and pre-tax income and the low tax rate, which may not be repeatable. Outlook: Absent detailed disclosures, base case is steady earnings with sensitivity to credit costs and JGB/foreign bond valuation. Any BoJ policy normalization could modestly aid core earnings through NIM improvement but may generate AFS valuation volatility.
Liquidity: Traditional current/quick ratios are not meaningful for banks; liquidity assessment requires loan-to-deposit ratio, HQLA composition, and maturity ladder, which are not provided. Solvency: Equity of ¥36.185bn on ¥914.674bn assets gives a calculated equity ratio of ~3.96%; leverage (liabilities/equity) is ~23.5x (consistent with the provided 23.51x). Regulatory capital (CET1, total capital, leverage ratio) is not disclosed, limiting solvency conclusions. Funding: Liability-heavy structure is standard; deposit mix and wholesale funding reliance are unknown, a key limitation. Interest coverage is shown as 0.0x due to non-disclosure; for banks, coverage is not typically used. Overall, the balance sheet scale and leverage fit a regional bank profile, but capital adequacy cannot be confirmed from this dataset.
All cash flow figures (operating, investing, financing, and cash/equivalents) are unreported in the feed, so OCF/NI and FCF cannot be assessed. For banks, cash flow-based FCF is less informative than earnings plus credit cost trends and securities valuation, but even these components are undisclosed here. Working capital metrics do not apply in a standard sense to banks; instead, we would review deposit stability and loan growth, which are not provided. Earnings quality is therefore indeterminate: the 24% YoY net income increase may reflect non-recurring items or tax effects given the low implied tax rate (~8.8%).
Dividend data (DPS, payout ratio, FCF coverage) are unreported. With H1 net income at ¥425m and equity at ¥36.185bn, the bank likely targets a conservative payout typical of regional peers, but we cannot quantify coverage or policy adherence. Without OCF and regulatory capital metrics (CET1, risk-weighted assets), we cannot assess capacity for stable dividends or room for increases. Key determinants would include sustainable core profit (NIM and fee income), credit cost normalization, and valuation volatility in the securities book.
Business Risks:
Financial Risks:
Key Concerns:
Key Takeaways:
Metrics to Watch:
Relative Positioning: Based on scale and leverage, the bank aligns with Japan’s regional bank cohort, exhibiting modest profitability and likely conservative risk appetite; however, absent disclosures on NIM, credit costs, and capital, its relative strength versus peers cannot be firmly established.
This analysis was auto-generated by AI. Please note the following:
| Capital Stock | ¥8.00B | - | - |
| Capital Surplus | ¥7.23B | - | - |
| Retained Earnings | ¥22.22B | - | - |
| Treasury Stock | ¥-306M | - | - |
| Owners' Equity | ¥35.46B | ¥31.73B | +¥3.73B |