- Net Sales: ¥3.81B
- Operating Income: ¥-4M
- Net Income: ¥346M
- EPS: ¥-28.87
| Item | Current | Prior | YoY % |
|---|
| Net Sales | ¥3.81B | ¥3.99B | -4.4% |
| Cost of Sales | ¥3.10B | - | - |
| Gross Profit | ¥890M | - | - |
| SG&A Expenses | ¥906M | - | - |
| Operating Income | ¥-4M | ¥-16M | +75.0% |
| Non-operating Income | ¥9M | - | - |
| Non-operating Expenses | ¥40M | - | - |
| Ordinary Income | ¥-59M | ¥-47M | -25.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | ¥56M | - | - |
| Net Income | ¥346M | - | - |
| Net Income Attributable to Owners | ¥-74M | ¥330M | -122.4% |
| Total Comprehensive Income | ¥-66M | ¥355M | -118.6% |
| Depreciation & Amortization | ¥346M | - | - |
| Interest Expense | ¥39M | - | - |
| Basic EPS | ¥-28.87 | ¥127.34 | -122.7% |
| Dividend Per Share | ¥0.00 | ¥0.00 | - |
| Item | Current End | Prior End | Change |
|---|
| Current Assets | ¥4.77B | - | - |
| Cash and Deposits | ¥1.78B | - | - |
| Accounts Receivable | ¥1.74B | - | - |
| Inventories | ¥534M | - | - |
| Non-current Assets | ¥7.76B | - | - |
| Item | Current | Prior | Change |
|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | ¥1.11B | - | - |
| Financing Cash Flow | ¥-25M | - | - |
| Item | Value |
|---|
| Net Profit Margin | -1.9% |
| Gross Profit Margin | 23.3% |
| Current Ratio | 67.2% |
| Quick Ratio | 59.7% |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio | 4.34x |
| Interest Coverage Ratio | -0.10x |
| EBITDA Margin | 9.0% |
| Item | YoY Change |
|---|
| Net Sales YoY Change | -4.4% |
| Item | Value |
|---|
| Shares Outstanding (incl. Treasury) | 3.66M shares |
| Treasury Stock | 1.07M shares |
| Average Shares Outstanding | 2.59M shares |
| Book Value Per Share | ¥898.96 |
| EBITDA | ¥342M |
| Item | Amount |
|---|
| Q2 Dividend | ¥0.00 |
| Year-End Dividend | ¥0.00 |
This data was automatically extracted from XBRL files. Please refer to the original disclosure documents for accuracy.
Tokyo Board Industry Co., Ltd. (TSE:78150) posted FY2026 Q2 consolidated results under JGAAP showing a modest top-line contraction and near break-even operating performance amid elevated depreciation and financing burdens. Revenue was ¥3.814bn, down 4.4% YoY, reflecting softer demand and/or pricing in board-related products. Gross profit was ¥889.5m with a gross margin of 23.3%, indicating the core manufacturing spread remains positive despite a weaker sales environment. Operating income was essentially flat at a ¥4m loss, demonstrating cost discipline and/or pass-through effects offset by hefty depreciation (¥346.1m) that keeps reported EBIT subdued. EBITDA of ¥342.1m (9.0% margin) shows underlying cash earnings before non-cash charges remained positive. Ordinary income of ¥−59m and net income of ¥−74m indicate non-operating drag (notably interest expense of ¥39.0m) and the weight of depreciation, with EPS at ¥−28.87. DuPont analysis yields ROE of −3.18% driven by a modest negative net margin (−1.94%), low asset turnover (0.312x), and elevated financial leverage (5.24x). Liquidity is tight: the current ratio is 67.2%, the quick ratio 59.7%, and working capital is negative at ¥−2.324bn. Leverage is high with total liabilities of ¥10.124bn against equity of ¥2.33bn (implied equity ratio roughly 19.1%), and a debt-to-equity measure of 4.34x, leaving limited cushion for shocks. Despite the accounting loss, operating cash flow was strong at ¥1.112bn, implying material working-capital inflows and solid cash conversion in the period. Interest coverage is weak (−0.1x on EBIT), underscoring reliance on cash generation rather than earnings for debt service. Dividend data show DPS at ¥0 and payout at 0%, but zeros may reflect non-disclosure rather than an explicit suspension; policy clarity is needed. Several line items are unreported (e.g., investing cash flows, cash balance, equity ratio, share count), limiting precision on free cash flow and liquidity buffers; conclusions are therefore based on available non-zero datapoints and inferred calculations. Overall, the company is navigating a soft demand backdrop with resilient gross margin and positive EBITDA, but high depreciation, interest burden, and tight liquidity constrain near-term profitability and flexibility. Monitoring pricing, input costs, and working-capital dynamics will be key to sustaining OCF and stabilizing leverage through the remainder of the fiscal year.
ROE_decomposition: ROE −3.18% = Net margin (−1.94%) × Asset turnover (0.312x) × Financial leverage (5.24x). The negative net margin is the primary drag, with low asset turnover typical for capital-intensive boards manufacturing further damping returns. Elevated leverage amplifies the small earnings deficit into a negative ROE.
margin_quality: Gross margin of 23.3% indicates adequate product spread despite revenue decline. EBITDA margin of 9.0% suggests cash profits remain positive; however, heavy D&A (¥346.1m) erodes EBIT to approximately break-even (¥−4m). Ordinary loss (¥−59m) reflects financing and other non-operating costs, indicating margin pressure below the operating line.
operating_leverage: A 4.4% revenue decline drove operating income to a slight loss, implying moderate operating leverage given near-break-even EBIT. Fixed-cost absorption (depreciation and overhead) remains a key swing factor; small volume/pricing changes can tip EBIT positive or negative.
revenue_sustainability: Revenue fell 4.4% YoY to ¥3.814bn, suggesting softer end-market demand or pricing. Given the industry’s sensitivity to construction activity and housing starts, demand visibility may be uneven near term.
profit_quality: Positive EBITDA alongside a net loss indicates earnings are depressed by non-cash D&A and financing costs rather than core cash generation. Gross margin of 23.3% supports price-cost discipline, but the ordinary loss underscores vulnerability to interest expense.
outlook: With stable gross spreads and cost control, incremental volume recovery or pricing actions could return EBIT to positive territory. However, elevated leverage and weak coverage constrain flexibility; maintaining strong OCF via working-capital management is critical to support the second half. External factors—energy/input costs and construction demand—remain key swing variables.
liquidity: Current ratio 67.2% and quick ratio 59.7% indicate tight short-term liquidity and reliance on ongoing OCF to meet obligations. Working capital stands at ¥−2.324bn, highlighting dependence on payables/short-term debt financing.
solvency: Total assets are ¥12.219bn versus total liabilities of ¥10.124bn and equity of ¥2.33bn, implying an equity ratio of about 19.1% (equity/assets) despite the reported 0.0% figure being undisclosed. Debt-to-equity of 4.34x points to high leverage and limited balance-sheet headroom.
capital_structure: Financial leverage (5.24x per DuPont) and interest expense of ¥39.0m against negative EBIT yield weak interest coverage (−0.1x). The structure is skewed toward liabilities, making the company sensitive to interest rate and refinancing risks.
earnings_quality: Operating CF of ¥1.112bn versus net income of ¥−74m (OCF/NI −15.0x) suggests strong cash conversion driven by working-capital release and non-cash charges (notably D&A). This indicates accounting losses are not mirrored in cash terms this period.
FCF_analysis: Investing CF is unreported (shown as 0), so free cash flow cannot be reliably computed. On a directional basis, positive OCF after maintenance capex would likely remain positive if capex is modest relative to D&A, but this cannot be confirmed without disclosed investing cash flows.
working_capital: The sizeable OCF relative to EBITDA implies meaningful inflows from working-capital optimization (inventory/receivables). Sustainability of these inflows is uncertain; future periods may see normalization, potentially reducing OCF.
payout_ratio_assessment: Reported DPS is ¥0.00 with a payout ratio of 0.0%, which may reflect either a suspended dividend or undisclosed dividend data. Given negative net income, a cash payout would pressure coverage ratios.
FCF_coverage: FCF coverage cannot be assessed due to undisclosed investing cash flows. While OCF is strong, the lack of capex data prevents conclusions on sustainable cash available for distribution.
policy_outlook: Absent clear disclosure, assume a conservative stance on distributions until earnings recover and liquidity improves. Clarity on dividend policy, capex plans, and de-leveraging priorities will guide sustainability.
Business Risks:
- Demand cyclicality tied to housing starts and construction activity
- Input cost volatility (wood/recycled materials, energy, logistics) impacting gross margin
- Pricing power constraints in a competitive, commoditized board market
- Operational leverage from high fixed costs and depreciation
- Customer concentration and potential order timing volatility
Financial Risks:
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 4.34x) and low equity buffer (~19% implied equity ratio)
- Weak interest coverage (−0.1x EBIT basis) and sensitivity to interest-rate changes
- Tight liquidity (current ratio 67.2%, quick ratio 59.7%) and reliance on working-capital financing
- Potential OCF normalization if working-capital inflows reverse
- Refinancing risk if credit conditions tighten
Key Concerns:
- Sustaining positive OCF amid revenue softness and potential working-capital reversion
- Restoring positive operating income in the face of high D&A and financing costs
- Maintaining adequate liquidity given negative working capital and upcoming obligations
Key Takeaways:
- Revenue declined 4.4% YoY to ¥3.814bn; gross margin remained healthy at 23.3%
- EBITDA margin of 9.0% contrasts with near-break-even EBIT due to heavy D&A (¥346.1m)
- Net loss of ¥74m translates to ROE of −3.18% under high leverage (5.24x)
- Operating cash flow was strong at ¥1.112bn, likely boosted by working-capital release
- Liquidity and solvency are tight: current ratio 67.2%, debt-to-equity 4.34x, implied equity ratio ~19%
- Interest coverage is weak (−0.1x), highlighting vulnerability to financing costs
- Data gaps (investing CF, cash balance, dividends, shares) constrain FCF and per-share analysis
Metrics to Watch:
- Volume/pricing trends and revenue trajectory in 2H
- Gross margin resilience versus input and energy costs
- Capex and investing cash flows to assess true FCF
- Working-capital movements (receivables, inventories, payables) and OCF sustainability
- Interest burden and refinancing terms; net debt evolution
- Operating income trajectory relative to depreciation (breakeven threshold)
- Liquidity buffers (cash on hand, undrawn facilities) and current ratio
Relative Positioning:
Within Japan’s building materials/board segment, the company shows competitive gross spreads and positive EBITDA but sits toward the leveraged, liquidity-constrained end of the spectrum, making near-term performance more sensitive to demand and financing conditions than peers with stronger balance sheets.
This analysis was auto-generated by AI. Please note the following:
- No Guarantee of Accuracy: The accuracy and completeness of this analysis are not guaranteed. For accurate financial data, please refer to the original disclosure documents published on TDnet or other official sources
- Not Investment Advice: This analysis is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice under applicable securities laws. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell any specific securities
- At Your Own Risk: Investment decisions should be made at your own discretion and risk. We assume no liability for any losses incurred based on this analysis