Modalis Therapeutics Corporation FY2025 Q3 earnings report and financial analysis
About Quarterly Earnings Report Disclosures
| Item | Current | Prior | YoY % |
|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A Expenses | ¥180M | - | - |
| Operating Income | ¥-1.81B | ¥-1.06B | -70.9% |
| Non-operating Income | ¥20M | - | - |
| Non-operating Expenses | ¥16M | - | - |
| Ordinary Income | ¥-1.80B | ¥-1.06B | -69.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | ¥921,000 | - | - |
| Net Income | ¥-1.06B | - | - |
| Net Income Attributable to Owners | ¥-1.80B | ¥-1.06B | -69.9% |
| Total Comprehensive Income | ¥-1.81B | ¥-1.06B | -70.9% |
| Interest Expense | ¥3M | - | - |
| Basic EPS | ¥-23.91 | ¥-27.21 | +12.1% |
| Dividend Per Share | ¥0.00 | ¥0.00 | - |
| Item | Current End | Prior End | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Assets | ¥3.62B | - | - |
| Cash and Deposits | ¥3.58B | - | - |
| Non-current Assets | ¥74M | - | - |
| Total Assets | ¥3.42B | ¥3.69B | ¥-268M |
| Current Liabilities | ¥117M | - | - |
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3083.0% |
| Quick Ratio | 3083.0% |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio | 0.05x |
| Interest Coverage Ratio | -609.47x |
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding (incl. Treasury) | 80.07M shares |
| Treasury Stock | 63 shares |
| Average Shares Outstanding | 75.34M shares |
| Book Value Per Share | ¥33.63 |
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Q2 Dividend | ¥0.00 |
| Year-End Dividend | ¥0.00 |
| Item | Forecast |
|---|---|
| Dividend Per Share Forecast | ¥0.00 |
This data was automatically extracted from XBRL files. Please refer to the original disclosure documents for accuracy.
Modalis (4883) reported FY2025 Q3 (cumulative) consolidated results under JGAAP that indicate a pre-revenue operating model with substantial losses and ample short-term liquidity. Reported revenue is undisclosed (0 placeholder), consistent with an early-stage biotech that typically books lumpy license/milestone income rather than recurring sales. Operating income was a loss of ¥1,815 million, and ordinary income was a loss of ¥1,798 million, showing only minor non-operating effects. Net income was a loss of ¥1,801 million, broadly mirroring operating losses and implying limited financial income/expense impact beyond a small interest burden. EPS was -¥23.91, highlighting material per-share losses. Interest expense was ¥2.978 million, confirming very low financial leverage and a negligible debt service burden. Total assets were ¥3,423 million and total liabilities ¥143 million, suggesting a light balance sheet with minimal obligations. Current assets were ¥3,617 million versus current liabilities of ¥117 million, resulting in working capital of ¥3,499.8 million and an exceptionally high current ratio of about 30.8x, indicating strong short-term solvency. Total equity was reported at ¥2,693 million, implying modest financial leverage of approximately 1.27x (assets/equity). The equity ratio field is shown as 0.0% (undisclosed), but a simple calculation from reported assets and equity implies an equity ratio near the high-70s percent range. Cash flow data (OCF/ICF/FCF) are undisclosed, limiting direct visibility into cash burn; however, given the large net loss and pre-revenue profile, operating cash outflow is likely sizable. The interest coverage ratio appears deeply negative (-609.5x) because of the operating loss, yet the absolute level of interest expense is very small. Dividends were not paid (DPS 0), which is appropriate for a loss-making, R&D-focused company. Some internal inconsistencies exist (e.g., current assets exceeding total assets; total assets not equaling liabilities plus equity), so ratio analysis relies on the subset of internally consistent figures (e.g., working capital calculation and leverage ratio provided). Overall, the company remains in an investment phase with substantial liquidity buffers relative to short-term obligations but continues to incur large operating losses absent disclosed revenue. The near-term thesis hinges on achieving partnering milestones or clinical catalysts that could convert to revenue and improve operating leverage. Until then, the company is likely reliant on cash reserves and potential external financing to fund operations.
ROE_decomposition: DuPont inputs are constrained by undisclosed revenue. Using available figures: net margin is not meaningful due to revenue disclosure as 0; asset turnover is not computable; financial leverage (assets/equity) ≈ 1.27x (¥3,423m/¥2,693m). With net loss of ¥1,801m, ROE would be negative, but the provided calculated ROE is shown as 0.00% due to zero-revenue placeholders. Conceptually, ROE is negative and driven almost entirely by operating losses rather than leverage. margin_quality: Operating loss of ¥1,815m with no disclosed gross margin implies R&D and SG&A are the dominant cost drivers. Ordinary loss of ¥1,798m closely tracks operating loss, indicating minimal non-operating distortion and thus ‘clean’ loss quality (i.e., losses are operational rather than financial). Effective tax is near zero (income tax ¥0.921m against a large loss), consistent with loss-making biotech firms. operating_leverage: With no recurring revenue disclosed, operating leverage is currently unfavorable: fixed operating costs (R&D/overheads) drive large losses. Should milestone/license income be recognized, incremental revenue would likely drop through with high contribution due to low COGS in a licensing model, but current period shows no evidence of scale benefits.
revenue_sustainability: Revenue is undisclosed; for a platform biotech, revenue—when recognized—tends to be volatile and tied to milestones, option exercises, or upfront fees. Sustainability depends on breadth and cadence of partnerships and pipeline progress. profit_quality: Net loss of ¥1,801m with negligible interest expense indicates losses are operational. Absence of disclosed depreciation/amortization suggests limited capital intensity, but D&A is undisclosed, not necessarily zero. Profit quality is thus primarily a function of cash operating burn rather than accounting charges. outlook: Near-term growth depends on converting R&D progress into monetizable milestones or new alliances. Without disclosed top line, the base run-rate is effectively zero, making growth optics binary around deal timing or clinical catalysts. Any announcement of licensing income could dramatically improve quarterly optics, but sustainability would remain uncertain.
liquidity: Current assets ¥3,617,079k vs current liabilities ¥117,322k implies a current ratio of ~30.8x and quick ratio similarly ~30.8x (no inventories). Working capital is ¥3,499,757k, providing a sizable buffer for near-term funding needs. solvency: Total liabilities of ¥143,471k vs total assets of ¥3,423,000k and equity of ¥2,693,000k point to low leverage; financial leverage ≈ 1.27x. Interest expense is only ¥2,978k, indicating very light debt usage. capital_structure: Debt-to-equity ~0.05x (as provided) reflects a net-cash-like position. Reported equity ratio field is 0.0% (undisclosed); calculated equity ratio from provided assets and equity implies ~78.7%, although balance sheet totals show inconsistencies, so treat with caution.
earnings_quality: OCF is undisclosed; given a ¥1,801m net loss and negligible interest, cash burn is likely substantial but cannot be precisely quantified. With minimal non-operating items, earnings largely reflect operating cash use, absent large non-cash charges (D&A undisclosed). FCF_analysis: Free cash flow is undisclosed (placeholder 0). Capex intensity is unknown but likely modest for a platform-biotech. In the absence of revenue, true FCF is likely negative. working_capital: Working capital of ¥3,499,757k is strong. Without cash breakdown, we infer that current assets are likely dominated by cash and equivalents or short-term investments, supporting runway; however, exact cash balance and burn rate are not disclosed.
payout_ratio_assessment: DPS is 0 and payout ratio is 0%, appropriate for a loss-making, R&D-stage company. With negative earnings, any payout would be unsustainable. FCF_coverage: FCF is undisclosed (placeholder 0), but given likely negative FCF, dividends would not be covered by free cash flow; the current no-dividend stance is prudent. policy_outlook: Dividend initiation is unlikely near term while the company remains pre-revenue/loss-making and prioritizes funding R&D. Future policy could evolve if the business transitions to steady licensing cash flows.
Business Risks:
Financial Risks:
Key Concerns:
Key Takeaways:
Metrics to Watch:
Relative Positioning: Versus domestic early-stage biotech peers on the TSE Growth market, Modalis appears conservatively levered with strong short-term liquidity but remains fully dependent on external monetization events (partnerships/milestones) to offset an ongoing operating cost base; visibility on near-term top line is lower than peers that already recognize recurring collaboration revenue.
This analysis was auto-generated by AI. Please note the following:
| Non-current Liabilities | ¥26M | - | - |
| Total Liabilities | ¥143M | - | - |
| Total Equity | ¥2.69B | ¥3.55B | ¥-855M |
| Capital Stock | ¥1.76B | - | - |
| Capital Surplus | ¥3.08B | - | - |
| Retained Earnings | ¥-1.33B | - | - |
| Treasury Stock | ¥-97,000 | - | - |
| Owners' Equity | ¥2.66B | ¥3.53B | ¥-867M |
| Working Capital | ¥3.50B | - | - |